Fabriquè en Babylon: Don’t Let “Them” Win

13625105_10157166608305271_771688468_nI hearken back to hallowed antiquity (or the 2012 election season, anyway), about six months after meeting a fellow corpsman I had the honor to serve with and the wonderful privilege of becoming good friends with, a Mr. Smith. He was a young black man from Chicago, struck with curiosity about this “crazy white guy from New Orleans”, and the two of us were regularly referred to as “Ebony and Ivory.” This was for several reasons, not the least of which being how often we hung out away from the Med-Surg/Post-Op ward of Walter Reed (“The President’s Hospital” in the D.C. Metro area) we worked on.

Why do I mention this? Because Smith and I had a very distinctive quality, one that we’ve both acknowledged (as we did at the time) in the time elapsed since that it defined our friendship. This quality was the ability for both of us to literally discuss anything (and I do mean anything) and even if we disagreed (as we did about 25-33% of the time) we would calmly explain the rationale behind our different opinions, hear the other person’s thoughts in their entirety, and then if we remained as staunch in our disagreement as we were at the outset, we simply agreed to disagree and move on.

Why am I going on about this? Because, again, we discussed everything. Nothing was forbidden. And we often discussed politics due not only to our being stationed in the D.C. area but also because I didn’t shy away from acknowledging (to my friends, anyway) that I was considering an eventual run for the U.S. House of Representatives. Smith and I always had immense respect for one another, so much so that even though I was the enlisted team leader of our shift of four (corpsmen and medics) I would not only defer things like assignments and other daily decisions to Smith as the Assistant team lead but regularly insisted that if he wanted the top spot he could not only have it but would likely have outperformed me. Smith refused every time.

Smith & I had the honor of pinning on the new rank of one of the Army officers/nurses we served with in Bethesda, Maryland
Smith & I had the honor of pinning on the new rank of one of the Army officers/nurses we served with in Bethesda, Maryland

“With your walk and your beliefs, your willingness to reach across the aisle to other parties and other people’s communities, you’d better be ready.”

“Wait I minute,” I said, stopping down the hall. “My ‘walk?’”

“Uh, yeah DeViney,” he said, visibly frustrated. “You can’t have swag and not get it noticed. You walk like an old-school brother, and you wanna help people in the inner city, and you’re not shy about reaching across communities and parties? You better get ready!”

We would go to bars and sit and have a plethora of strong drink, to include Long Islands, shots of Rumple Minze and the occasional Jägerbomb (to stave off fatigue). And we would delve deep into sociopolitical topics and, because of our mutual level of comfort, oftentimes we discussed racial issues at length. We also taught each other a lot, as you’d be amazed at just how much a disagreement, followed by a genuine desire to understand one another, with educated follow-ups (we’d continue discussions after having both sought further knowledge) can reveal not only about one another but about “the system” in general. Mr. Smith learned that Richard Nixon not only supported, fought and voted for every single piece of civil rights legislation ever to exist during his time in Congress and then as Vice President and President went to great lengths and succeeded in being of great net benefit to the black community at large. For my part, I took a great deal of interest in names like W.E.B. Du Bois (I read “The Souls of Black Folk” long before having it as assigned reading at Penn State after my Naval career), Hosea Williams and U.S. Representative Shirley Chisholm (D-NY), names he mentioned to augment what I already knew about the Civil Rights Movement.

Our mutual respect was only enhanced and strengthened when we both took an interest in the opinions and source material(s) of the other person. In turn, our discussions continued to become deeper, oftentimes lasting hours during our time off duty. They resulted in some of the best times and the richest dialogue either of us had ever experienced on a multitude of issues, we both later acknowledged.

A couple of running themes we would both engage in discussing at work were things like violence and the mainstream acceptance and seeming embrace of what we thought was prostitution.

“In high school, sure, people would fight, handle their business, whatever, but nobody was coming back with a knife or a gun to kill that person at a later date,” I observed.

“Yeah,” Smith began. “And they weren’t trying to fight each other every time they saw each other from then on. When it was over, it was over. This crap, man…”

“…exactly,” I said with a sigh. The latest of shootings, long forgotten four years later, had us both perplexed and puzzled. “It wasn’t always this way. In 2002, 2003 at the end of my time in high school?”

“Hell no,” he said. “And there weren’t any ho’s back in the day getting’ famous with a damned sex tape! I mean, yeah that was happening around then but I mean, that changed between the 90’s and now. It’s like everybody’s lost their damned minds!”

“I know!” I exclaimed. “And the fact that these harlots, male or female, get rewarded for this? This used to be the domain of pornography, sure …”

“…but it stayed there!” Smith said, growing animated to match my own exasperation. “There wasn’t some mainstream career and everybody forgiving it and buying your clothes and you getting a tv deal, I mean…”

“…yeah, this s**t is just nuts. Absolute, g*******d Disneyland!”

Smith's closest to the camera on right w/me two down from him on right w/light blue shirt
Smith’s closest to the camera on right w/me two down from him on right w/light blue shirt

Something had changed over the last fifteen to twenty years, we both agreed, and not for the better. And whatever it was, and wherever we’ve ended up, however we’ve come to a place in time where the killing of unarmed people by police, the ambush of cops responding to distress calls, the deliberate instigation of racial conflict by billionaires on opposite sides of the proverbial fence where there previously was no overt conflict and certainly no bloodshed…if this is the “new normal”, then we need to take a very long, hard and difficult look in the mirror and ask ourselves, as a people, what it is that we truly value the most. If money is the answer to all woes, then people like Heath Ledger and Whitney Houston would still be alive. Unfortunately there’s no legislation to be written, no judge’s decision forthcoming and no magic vaccine coming that will eradicate hatred. And overt instances of discrimination like forcing white students to go around and not use the main gate at UC-Berkeley and telling grade school kids that “to be born white is to be born racist” is, yes, offensive to people like me and my family, where my parents raised me with love in my heart and they embraced my black friends just as they did my white friends and my gay friends were treated just as equally well. But it’s more than causing hurt in people like myself who are not part of the problem (who speak out and lend support to civil rights movements not behaving destructively): they’re fueling hatred in that small echelon of white society, where hidden away (I don’t know them nor do I know where they burrow) white supremacists (white nationalist is a better label) are using what happened at Berkeley this month and what school children in the Northeast are being taught to add fuel to the fire and say, “You see? Our survival as a race is threatened!” It will not have the desired effect, unless said effect is further hatred and violence.

My call to all communities is, yes, as cheesy as it may sound, to listen and seek to learn. And before you become angry with something someone allegedly said, find out if their message is really as broad as they want you to believe it is, or if someone like George Soros is helping paid stooges start riots at Trump rallies and instigate conflict(s) with local police departments.

I hate to say it, but wealthy individuals with agendas are manipulating civil rights and political organizations that often started out with noble intentions but, via the allure of the Almighty Dollar, fell prey to the lethal hypnosis of Nationalism and its corresponding drumbeat of Hate.

Problems in San Diego: The Most Over-rated City in America
Problems in San Diego: The Most Over-rated City in America

And I’m not just talking to the New Black Panther Party or just to the Ku Klux Klan or any other group inciting and/or playing off hatred and disharmony. As a caveat, to those who would say the Black Panthers are not a hate group, I would say they did not start out that way. Rather, they began as self-defense for blacks in areas where they could get no reliable (if any) police protection and simply registering to vote (much less going to vote) could be a matter of life and death in many areas of the country. Today, however, the neo element of the party, the re-formed (not reform) group has stood outside of polling places (like they did in Philadelphia during the 2012 election) with nightsticks, screaming unfortunate phrases like, “Death to all white babies!” And I care not whether the godless freaks at Berkeley or some Ivy League sanitarium consider that racism. It is racism if it is based on discrimination or the treatment/mistreatment of others based on their melanin count, their ethnicity, their geographical origin, et cetera.

Scary. Not admirable: sick. Frightening. And his book sucked, too.
Scary. Not admirable: sick. Frightening. And his book sucked, too.

With that, I turn my gaze towards the abominable KKK, the neo-Nazis and all other followers of Adolf Hitler, George Lincoln Rockwell, et al, and now it’s your turn: I, my wife, my immediate DeViney family, my in-laws, the white friends I grew up with, made in high school and college and associated with in the Navy in both D.C. and California, all the way to today, back in my hometown of New Orleans…we are absolutely sick to [expletive deleted] death of a select few of our ethnicity, the outspoken jerks among us, making things worse in race relations. And yes, I’m looking at you, David Duke, and I’m looking at you, Donald J. Trump.

No, I’m not trying to place the two of them together, because Trump likely didn’t know who David Duke was when he endorsed him, meanwhile I and a lot of other self-respecting Louisiana white folks have tried very hard to forget we knew his name. Several European countries had enough of him and England (at the very least) said not to come back and I don’t particularly blame them. The KKK may very well have started immediately following the American Civil War not, as it turns out, to terrorize the black man but to instill fear and drive out the “carpetbaggers” who came to the South to profit off of the already-struggling land owners in desperate need of cash, and other Southerners in similarly-dire straits. That noble vein, however, quickly disappeared and the KKK indeed became a group of intolerance and hatred. Please, Dr. Duke, you’re not fooling anyway so don’t go away angry just…go away.

This is an older pic because last time I saw Dr. Duke before announcing his US Senate campaign, he had a thick, long ZZ Top-esque beard and was very unkempt...kinda looked homeless
This is an older pic because last time I saw Dr. Duke before announcing his US Senate campaign, he had a thick, long ZZ Top-esque beard and was very unkempt…kinda looked homeless

“Tolerance” does not mean swallowing everything hook, line and sinker and/or embracing everything groups unlike your own say. No, rather it means “to put up with.”

We were not far away from such an intellectually and socially gilded era not so long ago, but then the Super PACs came and the Koch’s and the Ayers and Soros spent hundreds of millions in ads in every format and scientific research (pick a college) has proven that never-ending repetition does sink in and after awhile even news programming has increased anxiety and caused disharmony and ethnic stratification.

Enough! The U.S. Congress has hovered between 12-13.5% approval for years now, with the media wallowing in the marsh of their own creation as purveyors of filth and of the ethno-racial conflict they’ve knowingly fomented and have the perpetual 4-5% approval rating they fully deserve.

What does that tell you? I hope it tells you to get your news from a wire service or from outlets that offer very little opinion next to their reporting, such as Reuters. Or, find a truly unbiased source that allows those with opinions of all colors and stripes to be expressed. Like, oh, I dunno…oh, yes, ModState LLC. Yeah, we did an interview with a self-proclaimed “white civil rights leader” (he was no foaming madman, he merely expressed irritation at Africans and Asians being able to be proud of their heritage but not being able to do so if you have European heritage) followed by three separate editorial postings in support of Black Lives Matter and expressing empathy with the overall plight of Black Americans.

I hope it tells you, deep down, that we (the American people) aren’t going to let them win.

For my part, as an American of largely Franco-British (France & England, with some Irish, German and Israeli) origins, I want to be allowed to acknowledge and take pride in the positive elements of my heritage and discard the rest (of my own volition). Further, I want to continue to reach across the aisle(s) and reach out to other communities, as my friend Smith acknowledged I did.

Once, we both showed up to a Navy physical readiness test and an enlisted leader we both know asked how work was on our ward. I replied, “Oh, well, Petty Officer, about as good as always.” She then laughed and said, “I like that. You answered the question without directly responding to it. You should be a politician.”

Smith then chuckled and said with a grin, “He is.

Six Degrees of Knowin’ Nothin’: [Untitled]

And on the 8th day, God made bears. Lots and lots of bears.

Does this era need introduction? Or, rather, may a suitable introduction be written? I report, you deride.

1: In any rational era, the sudden appearance of lurid photographs of well-known public figures tends to happen without the consent of those captured in the images. Jennifer Lawrence, Kate Upton, Anthony Weiner, et al. Notable exceptions to this are of the celebutante variety who sport last names such as Hilton and Kardashian, but then, their deliberate release of self-incriminating material isn’t indicative of a rational era.

That there’s a Stairway to Heaven but a Highway to Hell is indicative of expected traffic volume.

The great Jerry Falwell, Jr., well his undeniable greatness as an Evangelical Christian minister and university president is so ineffable, so vast, that he was no longer able to be confined by any notion of modern decency. If that’s still a thing, that is. Either way, the photograph posted containing the erstwhile head of Liberty University (and descendent of the late and decent Jerry Falwell) is disturbing on several counts. Let’s take a look:

Now, I’m not sure if it’s the ghastly attempt at humor (yeah, “black water”, haw haw haw!), the self-caricature of the gut and the unzipped pants combined with the awful rug on his counterpart (who is not his wife, for those keeping score at home), the fact that students of said Evangelical university get expelled for drinking and/or extra-marital sexual encounters, or that this wasn’t a leak at all that makes this such a disgrace. He could’ve just said it was a faux Black Dog in his glass and been done with it.

The man (so-called) “leaked” it via his own social media aperture, and then delivered a truly abysmal mockery of an apology on-air, and I quote: “I’ve promised my kids I’m going to try to be…I’m gonna try to be a good boy from here on out.” Rock and Roll, Jerry!

Oh and Mrs. Falwell, when your marriage does end, remember: you [expletive deleted] your rebound, and that’s it. You don’t permanently abscond from reality and keep [expletive deleted] them long-term and/or marry them. Especially, I might add, if you plucked them from the extras of “The Walking Dead.”

Silly me. But seriously, though: booze and Evangelicals and social media shouldn’t mix.

2: At times, the headlines write themselves. In their own attempt to swing loose with reality, as it were, Iran has a fabricated aircraft carrier resembling one of those wielded by the United States Navy. “Why”, you ask? An entirely unscripted and well-placed question. For their own propaganda purposes that is, until the entire experiment blew up in their faces. Living out their own version of “delirium tremens”, Iran was so successful in this charade that their accidental destruction of a prop US Navy aircraft carrier poses a threat to a major thoroughfare in the oil trade. Posing an existential threat to traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, and things apparently unbeknownst to Iran such as tides can shift the wreckage, endangering oil tankers.

Give the Ayatollah our best. Speaking of “the best”, if you’re going to challenge the world’s preeminent naval power, you’d better come correct. The Battle of Evermore this is not.

3: Biden must face Trump in debate(s). Yes, it’s answering a “double dog dare” from the POTUS and no, you don’t want to give in to the whims of a bully. But if you don’t follow through then it looks like you’re hiding in a basement and afraid to face Donald J. Trump on the stage. What’s the worst that could happen? They then “triple dog dare” one another to a lindy hop dance-off to the “Misty Mountain Hop” or hand out four sticks (one to both members of each ticket) to swing with? Why would you be afraid of that if you’re in the Biden camp unless, per the Trump camp’s assertions, the former Vice President will be unable to remember whether he’s going to California, or another, “y’know, the thing” that the Founding Fathers said? The great equalizer is the human ego. They’ll debate.

This is an event waiting to go wrong. Don’t hang out with bears. [image credit to Daily Caller & Barstool Sports]
4: Meanwhile, the National Park Service has posted a warning urging American adventurers not to confront bears but, if they do, to not take advantage of their slower companions. And no, this is not made up. Nor is the response of a pack of humans, recently, to a bear arriving in their midst. They didn’t flee or otherwise attempt to discourage the bear; instead they took pictures of their merry band whilst feeding the bear. Good call, ‘Murica.

5: Bill Barr’s appearance was a disgrace for everyone except the Attorney General. For committee chairman Nadler, to open the hearing with that statement was an outrage; and Jordan, thanks for the monologue on things that happened before Barr was back on the job and for God’s sake put your damn coat on!

6: Stat of the Week: the POTUS’ campaign is knocking on 1 million doors a week; the former VPOTUS’ camp is knocking on 0. As in ZERO. Z-E-R-O. This sort of nonsense only seems like nonsenseuntil the time when the levee breaks. Underestimate the mad media genius of The Donald at your peril.

Y’know what? Let’s just cancel everything. If everything’s priority one, then nothing is priority one.
Read More

Contrast: Black Lives Matter v. All Lives Matter (et al)

Black Lives Matter: Let’s cut through the fat together, shall we? Yes or yes? Good. With that, we have a problem in America. Several, actually. We live in a police state, for one thing, and for another, paramount now, is said police state taking a particular interest in African Americans.

Let’s also consider the unbelievable, highly-classified powers of FISA courts to spy unopposed on our own people without their knowledge indefinitely, the ability of the Federal government to suspend the Constitutional rights of American citizens suspected of terrorism via the Patriot Act and the inexplicable repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act (which forbade the Federal Government from using propaganda on American soil). Are you drinking what I’m pouring?

With no malice in my heart toward the many fine police officers across the land (a few I’ve known personally), I say again: we live in a police state.

Over the past decade alone, we have seen increasing examples of the use of excessive force on a disproportionate number of black Americans. Data clearly shows that Whites compose 76.5% of America’s citizenry while Blacks make up 13.4% of it, the former were shot to death by police 370 times versus 235 for the latter.

For those who want to bring out FBI data displaying prevalence of crime amongst inner city black neighborhoods, recall the negligible difference in drug use between whites and blacks and the parity in gun culture between the two.

America glorifies violence, and that crosses ethnic lines. Don’t believe me? Look at what I call “Dollar Voting”, in essence, what we value and spend our money on. What does our art and culture reflect? If we’re being real, it ain’t peace. Does hip hop culture lend itself to violence? Listen to the top ten hits of the genre and get back to me; but before you get back to me, let me know what Johnny Cash, Waylon Jennings, Jerry Reed and “The Dukes of Hazzard” were all about while you’re at it.

As for the movement itself, “Black Lives Matter” is driving home a simple point: yes, every house in the neighborhood matters but only one of them is on fire.

We hardly need a hashtag for Blue (Police) Lives Matter; they roam about largely unopposed, vested with a badge and lethal weaponry, and we provide a safety net (union, pension, et cetera) and, in general, blanket support to include the high probability that bad actors aren’t held accountable in court.

All Lives Matter? Do they? Maybe I’d be more decisive in answering these questions if every new episode of “Death By Cop” didn’t always star a black man.

– Jack DeViney

*************

 

New Orleans Police Department preps for ongoing confrontation and protest throughout downtown.

All Lives Matter(?): Two things can be true at once. In fact, very few things in our world are mutually exclusive of themselves. One can, for example, be in favor of the events in the George Floyd case never happening again and find the phrase “Black Lives Matters” offensive. They are not mutually exclusive. Both can be true. This depends on your definitions of words. Words matter. Words have meaning. Facts matter. Facts have meaning.

If by any definition, one is not a racist, but they will not stand shoulder to shoulder with Black Lives Matter signs, or they won’t kneel down in front of a mob of protestors, they become….what? Insensitive? Divisive?

To be true to this point, I believe “All Lives Matter” or “Blue Lives Matter” are equally asinine. We don’t protest on things we agree upon. We don’t stand outside and shout “the sky is blue”!

Are things worse now than the mid-1960’s? Or do we see public discord in 3D now? We report, you deride.

The assertion that a black man can not step from his home without fear of imminent death from a racist ‘Mericuh is as equally preposterous as the media’s “1619” narrative that America is as systemically racist as at any time in our history. Really? Where’s the poll of young, black men asking them if they’d rather live in 1865, 1965 or 2020? I must’ve missed that astute revelation.

Instead of regurgitated statistics that the left/media refuse to acknowledge anyway, how about we come at this from a novel approach. [So] what is your suggestion? I mean, with all of the statistics stating the exact opposite of your point, what are we doing wrong? Are our hiring standards too low? Is training being swept aside to fast-track officers onto beats? Do we provide immunity to officers that is unnecessary and counter-productive? Let’s get to the “nut cutting” as they say.

If we want to turn this into another narrative where the right just refuses to admit there is a substantial issue and is instead hiding behind years of conservative practices…show me! Where are the statistics that support any of this nonsense? That show America is systemically racist and prejudiced against black Americans? Where are the politicians that you are particularly citing as responsible for these aggressions? Or is it just “orange man bad”, with his “basket of deplorables”?

“You’re killing your father, Larry!”

Once again, the left/media have overplayed their hands. We were told millions of Americans would die if we didn’t shut the world down indefinitely. Now if you have a small business and want to re-open smartly so that you don’t lose everything, you’re killing grandma! We were told that if we would just allow LGBT marriages, all examples of bigotry would be history. Now if you’re a Millennial male that won’t go out with a trans-woman (a man by all scientific facts and definitions), you’re a homophobe! And now, if you won’t march to the beat of this drum, well, you’re just a racist. Or worse, an “Uncle Tom.”

It’s tiring. It’s divisive. It’s unnecessary. This issue is one we must agree on, or we don’t have a country. You cannot have law and order if one group is being systematically hunted down and killed by those sworn to protect us.

Facts matter. Statistics matter. Two things can be true at once.

– Michael R. DeViney, Jr.

Read More

Fabriqué en Babylon: Meanwhile

With the majority of public discourse non-existent and what discussion does occur usually ending acrimoniously, I recalled a lesson (from the past) learned the hard way: in life, there are times the rules are such that, indeed, sometimes the only way to win is not to play.

Politics is considered the art of the compromise, or “the game of compromise,” to suit the lesson. Now, I don’t know if IQs dropped, if we forgot, if the entire paradigm changed despite the entire pantheon of examples (of public discourse), or if it’s an all-of-the-above that’s closer to where we’re at, but we’ve forgotten. One way or another, it’s that simple.

As “The Great Experiment”, that means that this is a failure as a nation. A failure to even try to communicate and find some semblance of common ground, to find a way to even try to be civil and respect one another’s time to speak, to actually listen to a message before deciding what it means and how we view that meaning, to even agree to try and communicate at all.

You see, the trick is in self-control. Before picking up your pitchforks and torches or, worse, leaving altogether, let the damned man have a few final words.

Fistfight breaks out in Turkish parliament

I say “self-control” is the key, if there is one, because in order for public discourse to function where there’s debate, dialogue and (hopefully) resolution at some point, we must individually approach this forum with the intention of conducting one’s self in a civil manner no matter what the opposition says or how they say it.

The first impulse is outrage, I’m aware, followed by some variant of, “So what do we do when [insert example of national Democrats and/or Republicans] start acting the fool?” And that’s precisely where, following my abandonment of my personal Facebook and Twitter accounts that the lesson learned previously (“sometimes the only way to win is not to play”) I remembered that silence isn’t always concession. Sometimes, it might be easy to think, “Ahp! Yep, see, DeViney’s silent so he’s conceding,” when, the truth is, I’ve also come to embrace another tactic summarized best as, “Let them talk; most people will hang themselves given enough rope.”

CNN was really on to something when they debuted the policy debates, featuring an epic duel between Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) versus Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) engaged in an actual, substantive, non-campaign debate. Too bad they didn’t keep the series alive.

In order to pull this off, one must listen to their opponent’s words and, I don’t have chapter and verse from Harvard or Little Sister’s of The Poor and this that or the other study to cite, but I do know that it is humanly impossible for you to absorb as much of what someone else is saying while you’re running your piehole. An easy life “hack” for this (I’m trying to meet you halfway, my fellow Millennials) is to engage in one of America’s most obvious traditions and gently shove, well, pie or any other food one prefers into their gaping maw, which should, advisably, prevent the pie-eater from interrupting while someone else is speaking.

Another idea, and I only mention it in passing, is to teach your children these same concepts so that there’s a generational sort of reboot here, if you will.

Another really good concept, and this brings me back to what we’ve lost in terms of public dialogue, as a nation, as a people, is drop the assumptions. Do I really need to say that, as a Federal republic of 325 million-plus people scattered across 50 nation-states over 3 million-plus square miles, people come from different backgrounds and therefore automatically have their own way of doing things?

Apparently. Just remember: how good is it? Really good.

“Why does any of this matter?” one might ask, certainly a wise and reverent question, and unscripted at that!

As I face the active task of delivering closing remarks that are dually comprehensible and comprehensive, my personal political platform has never stood out more and conversely never kept me directly out of the fray as often. That’s weird. We’re living in a weird era.

As a centrist, I see, for instance, the keen insight President Trump into the general failings of a bloated Federal bureaucracy that feeds right into the national angst of an alienated body of followers who argue the value they get for their investment as taxpayers isn’t worth spending in excess of $4 trillion annually. However crude one views his “one-in, two-out” policy regarding regulations, he was onto something. Specifically, the broader argument that, not because of lack of desire and hardly because of lack of money but because of the inadequacies and failings that are part of the very fabric of a bloated, administrative state; in short, our Federal government is a monstrosity. A monstrosity, I might add, that needs to be shrunk, not given more money.

On the other hand, I also see the benefits of a strong, but limited, leaner Federal government with a decisive Executive having multiple opportunities for reform in bipartisan areas (fringes on both sides notwithstanding) with Congress, and I see those very same opportunities going wanting right now. And that is where, yes, I can see the personality crises stemming from being willing to be at odds with anyone, anytime over anything bringing about, indeed, a sort of “Trump Fatigue.”

That cuts both ways as well: while the people grow weary of the constant drama President Trump’s approach relies upon, they also tire of every single failing in DC being laid at his feet.

The same President who picked a fight (via social media, but of course) with an Autistic foreign teenager over climate change he maintains doesn’t exist to begin with also felt like the status quo that denied opportunities to felons post-release was unfair (See: “The First Step Act”). The very same POTUS who inexplicably disavowed support (however briefly) for our Kurdish allies also did what every Administration since Carter had threatened to by being the American Executive who stood up to Communist China’s underhanded trade practices and illegal valuations of the Yuan (their currency), which gave them unfair advantage(s) in imports/exports against other countries.

I don’t blindly support any politician, and I’m leery of ideologues. I don’t have any heroic, holistic advice on how to approach the President or his (many) conflicts, some contrived and some born of circumstances outside of his control.

These thugs didn’t issue executive orders that restricted travel from other countries into their own. They killed people they didn’t like and/or want. Perhaps a bit of caution, then, before ascribing the President Trump to the ignominious league of names like “Hitler” and “Stalin”, methinks?

But I do know this: the sooner we can get one extreme to stop canonizing every wacky idea the President utters and convince the other side that, no, Sugar, dictators don’t ask other countries to stop immigrants, they just have them shot. Dictators don’t ask, and they don’t Tweet about being treated “very badly” by the judiciary and the media. They don’t have to.

Look at the big picture, and tell me where you’d rather be that would be a better country from which to launch Endeavor A or stand up for Civic Cause B, et al. So, you don’t like the President. I don’t know how much the President likes the President. But you ought to be able to know the difference in there being room for (bigly) improvement in our mixed capitalist system, and in living in a concentration camp as you and your fellow undesirables are systematically exterminated by an authoritarian state.

A dictator? Hitler? Really? See: “Godwin’s Law”

Sound extreme? So do y’all.

Read More