30 April, 2017: A Creed For All Seasons

It’s not often in this foul year of our Lord, two-thousand seventeen, that any verbose armchair scribe lacks for subject matter worthy of dissecting. Yet with my ongoing pursuit of an economics degree from Penn State and attempting to not lapse or permit a collapse in governing ModState, I’ve struggled mightily with the balance of mutually-agreeable means. This has been to further numerous ends that, if I’m right, will not only establish some semblance of consistent income for my person but also those loyalists who’ve been in (and out) of the trenches since last year.

For it was just only last year, on 30 April, 2016, that “The Modern State,” ModState, appeared with what cannot be described as less than superb timing. Not only was this prior election cycle steroids for political media but the 30th of April happens to be the day Louisiana was sold to America by the French. This happens to be both, yes, a coincidence but also something worth commemorating by ModState and its fellow New Orleans entrepreneurial enterprises.

There exists a time and place where, even from my temporary home in Southern California, a crew huddled together over the concept that would emerge as ModState. A year in, the crowd’s leaner. Life happened, and not everyone was completely prepared for some of the more bizarre turns that would happen along the way. We emerge from this first year of existence profitable by a three-digit margin that, while nothing to write home about, is far and away better than the massive losses endured by many startups. Additionally, we’ve more than gotten our fair share of mileage out of the allegedly legendary fraternity that is the United States Military. For starters, each of the three founding members of the ModState staff are veterans: yours truly, US Navy (2011-2016), joined by Al Eldeen of the US Army and graphic design wunderkind Samuel “DSamuel” Wheeler of the US Air Force (2011-2016). Augmenting the enterprise itself in a big way is “Blue Chip” editorial and multimedia addition, Nate Wellein, joining the enterprise as a stakeholding partner to boot.

Rounding out our current crew is new board member, our Chief Technology Officer, Peter Clevenger, and the aforementioned new editorial signee  Nate Wellein. Both men served in the US Army. Throw in the extensive, watershed sociopolitical stylings of former staff writer Dain Wilson (whom I went to Navy boot camp with and who’s still in the service), former contributor Brandon M. Shockley (who I served in the infantry with but who recently decided to reenlist, Navy) and last but not least, OP-ED author and legendary master of haberdashery, my father, Mike DeViney. Born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a short-time resident of Jacksonville, Florida in early childhood and long-time resident and men’s clothing dealer in New Orleans, Louisiana, my father is another name in the swollen ranks of former Army personnel in our midst, not to mention the fact he’s my hero.

All of these things are good things, things that attest to the overall strength of character, embarrassment of riches in terms of talent and to the overwhelming amount of determination and dexterity this crew is capable of. The nickname given me around the time I died for a quarter of an hour and came back (no, fo’ real!), “Jonny Comeback,” is rather fortuitous due to the very nature of circumstances around its adoption. Death has a way of generating introspection, but it is fitting. The amazing people in the proverbial trenches with me on this are beyond belief. Their abilities and their confidence, collectively and individually, remove what tiny shred of the intimidation factor remained after my half-decade of indentured servitude (also called “military service”). You don’t have to make a comeback when you’re leading wire-to-wire, ala Secretariat.

But what happens when you literally can’t come back? I don’t mean a lack of willpower, or even firepower. I don’t mean the moody shirker getting all “emo” when the ball didn’t bounce his way, figuratively or literally. I’m referring, rather, to the kid who’s tone deaf and desperately seeks to be the frontman for a “rock & roll” act that has been subjected to the same, endless volleys of universal entitlement as every other American. He hears the words “you can be anything, do anything you want!” ringing terribly hollow the last time around. Then the bullet hits the bone and wreaks havoc in splintering the marrow of belief, of drive. Bitterness awaits.

I felt this, after seven years, when Frank Campione and I called it a day for GamePartisan (2002-2009). It ended up breaking even which, while certainly better than ending in debt, is not exactly what we went through that level of heartache and struggle for. In the end, a firm out of Madeira (Portugal) bought the .com and it collapsed in less than a year due to a litany of mismanagement and, frankly, pure idiocy. Let it be known that I would strongly exhort anyone fancying themselves an entrepreneur to do their research and ensure that their product is, um, legal and stuff before deciding to conduct business in a foreign country. I know this to be random, but the sad (and sadly laughable) truth is nothing could deter these hustlers from turning GamePartisan into an online casino to be operated via several datacenters in America with highly-localized marketing backed by tens of thousands of dollars in pre-paid ad slots. In fact, they were so avant-garde and sassy that they cleverly waited until after committing said funds to see if their enterprise was, well, legal or illegal. Turns out that the warning(s) I uttered repeatedly to everyone involved on their side of things in Portugal fell on Portuguese or, uh, “deaf” ears and the enterprise promptly fell apart not long after the half-year mark. The 1980’s and video game heroes like Bubsy would’ve loved these clowns, though, because boy were they ever sassy…those ‘tudes were off the charts!

I felt it again as I neared closer to the chance to have my Navy contract bought out, summer 2012, for a chance to play either left or center mid in my box-to-box style in MLS (likely DC United). I could bend, chip, drive and garner assists using the outside of my left foot, preferred to the extent where I would watch tape of England icon David Beckham in a mirror so that his right-footed “goldenballs” would be reflected for my own, left-footed curly-curvy style. Harry Redknapp, of English Premier League club Tottenham (at the time) acknowledged that, while “quite raw in areas” (his words), I had the pace (combination of speed and quickness, actually), instincts and command of the game (I always lead in assists, serving as maestro and coordinating the offense, akin to Beckham, yes, and Italy’s “Maestro” Andrea Pirlo). To boot I had a tireless work ethic, racing back and diving in front of shots and taking physical punishment (I’m 5’10” and have been betwixt 155 and 168 lbs. my entire adult life). Ironically, it was my ability to bend the ball (and thus being assigned to free kicks and corners) that lead to the end of it all. Well, not “all”, but the immense pressure I placed on my plant foot, my right Achilles tendon (to be precise), finally took its toll. A slight tear in the ligament on the great toe of my left foot was tough but I played through it. A rupture and partial tear of my right Achilles, however, was the end of my days (collectively, at all levels) playing “The Beautiful Game”. Some around me thought it was the end of that day. Lying on the turf, feeling the swelling begin to mass, I knew the dream, my dream of ascending to the Men’s national team and being trusted by Jurgen Klinsmann to aid the Yanks in seeking national glory? I knew.

But? First-world problems, my friends. My family isn’t falling prey to the machetes of barbarians or the cruelty of female circumcision by vile, heathen dogs for some false, heretical reason. We don’t make a life-and-death decision when mulling over the grocery store or café. Life and death is different than winning and losing.

I look back and, sure, defeat’s always tough. Winning’s a lot more fun and a lot more marketable, but, ah, I repeat myself. But what do you say, again, when you can’t come back? When it’s all over, truly over, and, say, your closest sibling (in age, chronological vicinity and thus growing up closer) loses her second baby in sixteen months? What do you say when you handled the first event so poorly, that when the eldest, the older brother, when he called at Christmas 2015 you froze? You froze, afraid to say anything to your sister that might depress her more, and so you said nothing at all.

We’ve since made amends, and I spoke to her the day that her unborn son, an unwritten Creed of a man, died. That I had no more words than expressions of sorrow and love for her and the family…that helplessness doesn’t bode well with me or much of anything about me or slithering around inside of me. Economics is about solutions, be it through calculation and/or computation or working with models. The infantry is about a very precise sort of solution, and as a corpsman (Navy medic) with USMC infantry, the array of possible trauma I would see and treat was the long and short of my job (minus having an M4 to cause an enemy to need his own medical treatment). Playing soccer is “The Beautiful Game,” not unlike bass guitar in the “Four on the Floor,” killer disco/funk style: easy to learn, difficult to master.

But death, death borne by the mother of two of the unborn, two in less than one and one-half years? A mother who loves being a mother and has long put the needs of her children on par with her own survival has no concept of anything other than to endure when that unborn child’s life threatens her own.

For all the talk of dying for one’s country, of dying for a cause, dying for what one believes in, I had a rather stark, pragmatic realization. This epiphany (if you will) allows me to filter such living prose, these shades of glittering idealism we hear from the disengaged ravings of motivational speakers. These financially-successful street prophets who’ve never been on the street, but oh, my goodness, they sure are savvy! These heartless, walking aphorisms would no doubt have a perfect sequence of wise sayings to share with me about enduring struggle, about carrying my own weight, et al.  

The reality is, you’ve no idea how many of these fools are out there. We’ve met and, well, Officer, I’ve been around jive-turkeys before and, well, I’m pretty sure I’m sick of jive-turkeys, Officer. They’ve no concept of the struggles endured by those enslaved by the stark realities systematically enforced by the fractional reserve system of our time. Those of us in the Proletariat, in the Middle and Working Classes, need be a one-hit wonder as opposed to being a no-hit bumbler. Then you’re sneered at for being “new money.” On the wrong day, then they’ll be sneered at for missing teeth and pissing off the wrong loyal little brother.

Full circle, front and center, enters the stage: my epiphany, at long last. This pristine little secret (not everything is dirty, you deviants!) dispenses with the notion that to die for something is the pinnacle of dedication. While to die a martyr is indeed glorious (dependent on what’s “worth” dying for) and certainly a time-honored concept, once dead the struggle for [insert cause here] ends.

Take this for what it’s worth, stemming from my thirty-three years of experience on this maladjusted, malevolent rock (some call it “Earth”): the far more severe task is to live for a cause, to pay heed and nurture it consistently. Far more difficult is to keep it alive and to help it flourish, proselytizing enemies and maintaining working relationships with allies…all of that? That is exhausting and far more daunting a task than staring death down. I wasn’t even aware that that’s what was going on when I did break on through to the other side. I croaked for a whole quarter-hour, only to return and begin the real battle (to include seven surgeries, YAY!).

The Creed, a Creed surely for all time’s sake, is one that bears remembering: his name and our memory of his gallant efforts at survival are what endures as his physical suffering was brought to an early close by our Creator. His mother, as is always the case with mothers, will bear the true cost of living in honor of this Creed but without this Creed, simultaneously. That cruel juxtaposition, that hurtful, overwhelming bludgeoning of the spirit during life because of adherence to a belief?  This is a far more desperate struggle than the (usual) permanence of death.

I would know.

Fabriqué en Babylon: Meanwhile

With the majority of public discourse non-existent and what discussion does occur usually ending acrimoniously, I recalled a lesson (from the past) learned the hard way: in life, there are times the rules are such that, indeed, sometimes the only way to win is not to play.

Politics is considered the art of the compromise, or “the game of compromise,” to suit the lesson. Now, I don’t know if IQs dropped, if we forgot, if the entire paradigm changed despite the entire pantheon of examples (of public discourse), or if it’s an all-of-the-above that’s closer to where we’re at, but we’ve forgotten. One way or another, it’s that simple.

As “The Great Experiment”, that means that this is a failure as a nation. A failure to even try to communicate and find some semblance of common ground, to find a way to even try to be civil and respect one another’s time to speak, to actually listen to a message before deciding what it means and how we view that meaning, to even agree to try and communicate at all.

You see, the trick is in self-control. Before picking up your pitchforks and torches or, worse, leaving altogether, let the damned man have a few final words.

Fistfight breaks out in Turkish parliament

I say “self-control” is the key, if there is one, because in order for public discourse to function where there’s debate, dialogue and (hopefully) resolution at some point, we must individually approach this forum with the intention of conducting one’s self in a civil manner no matter what the opposition says or how they say it.

The first impulse is outrage, I’m aware, followed by some variant of, “So what do we do when [insert example of national Democrats and/or Republicans] start acting the fool?” And that’s precisely where, following my abandonment of my personal Facebook and Twitter accounts that the lesson learned previously (“sometimes the only way to win is not to play”) I remembered that silence isn’t always concession. Sometimes, it might be easy to think, “Ahp! Yep, see, DeViney’s silent so he’s conceding,” when, the truth is, I’ve also come to embrace another tactic summarized best as, “Let them talk; most people will hang themselves given enough rope.”

CNN was really on to something when they debuted the policy debates, featuring an epic duel between Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) versus Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) engaged in an actual, substantive, non-campaign debate. Too bad they didn’t keep the series alive.

In order to pull this off, one must listen to their opponent’s words and, I don’t have chapter and verse from Harvard or Little Sister’s of The Poor and this that or the other study to cite, but I do know that it is humanly impossible for you to absorb as much of what someone else is saying while you’re running your piehole. An easy life “hack” for this (I’m trying to meet you halfway, my fellow Millennials) is to engage in one of America’s most obvious traditions and gently shove, well, pie or any other food one prefers into their gaping maw, which should, advisably, prevent the pie-eater from interrupting while someone else is speaking.

Another idea, and I only mention it in passing, is to teach your children these same concepts so that there’s a generational sort of reboot here, if you will.

Another really good concept, and this brings me back to what we’ve lost in terms of public dialogue, as a nation, as a people, is drop the assumptions. Do I really need to say that, as a Federal republic of 325 million-plus people scattered across 50 nation-states over 3 million-plus square miles, people come from different backgrounds and therefore automatically have their own way of doing things?

Apparently. Just remember: how good is it? Really good.

“Why does any of this matter?” one might ask, certainly a wise and reverent question, and unscripted at that!

As I face the active task of delivering closing remarks that are dually comprehensible and comprehensive, my personal political platform has never stood out more and conversely never kept me directly out of the fray as often. That’s weird. We’re living in a weird era.

As a centrist, I see, for instance, the keen insight President Trump into the general failings of a bloated Federal bureaucracy that feeds right into the national angst of an alienated body of followers who argue the value they get for their investment as taxpayers isn’t worth spending in excess of $4 trillion annually. However crude one views his “one-in, two-out” policy regarding regulations, he was onto something. Specifically, the broader argument that, not because of lack of desire and hardly because of lack of money but because of the inadequacies and failings that are part of the very fabric of a bloated, administrative state; in short, our Federal government is a monstrosity. A monstrosity, I might add, that needs to be shrunk, not given more money.

On the other hand, I also see the benefits of a strong, but limited, leaner Federal government with a decisive Executive having multiple opportunities for reform in bipartisan areas (fringes on both sides notwithstanding) with Congress, and I see those very same opportunities going wanting right now. And that is where, yes, I can see the personality crises stemming from being willing to be at odds with anyone, anytime over anything bringing about, indeed, a sort of “Trump Fatigue.”

That cuts both ways as well: while the people grow weary of the constant drama President Trump’s approach relies upon, they also tire of every single failing in DC being laid at his feet.

The same President who picked a fight (via social media, but of course) with an Autistic foreign teenager over climate change he maintains doesn’t exist to begin with also felt like the status quo that denied opportunities to felons post-release was unfair (See: “The First Step Act”). The very same POTUS who inexplicably disavowed support (however briefly) for our Kurdish allies also did what every Administration since Carter had threatened to by being the American Executive who stood up to Communist China’s underhanded trade practices and illegal valuations of the Yuan (their currency), which gave them unfair advantage(s) in imports/exports against other countries.

I don’t blindly support any politician, and I’m leery of ideologues. I don’t have any heroic, holistic advice on how to approach the President or his (many) conflicts, some contrived and some born of circumstances outside of his control.

These thugs didn’t issue executive orders that restricted travel from other countries into their own. They killed people they didn’t like and/or want. Perhaps a bit of caution, then, before ascribing the President Trump to the ignominious league of names like “Hitler” and “Stalin”, methinks?

But I do know this: the sooner we can get one extreme to stop canonizing every wacky idea the President utters and convince the other side that, no, Sugar, dictators don’t ask other countries to stop immigrants, they just have them shot. Dictators don’t ask, and they don’t Tweet about being treated “very badly” by the judiciary and the media. They don’t have to.

Look at the big picture, and tell me where you’d rather be that would be a better country from which to launch Endeavor A or stand up for Civic Cause B, et al. So, you don’t like the President. I don’t know how much the President likes the President. But you ought to be able to know the difference in there being room for (bigly) improvement in our mixed capitalist system, and in living in a concentration camp as you and your fellow undesirables are systematically exterminated by an authoritarian state.

A dictator? Hitler? Really? See: “Godwin’s Law”

Sound extreme? So do y’all.

Read More

PRESS RELEASE: Al Eldeen Dismissal

Saturday, 18 May 2019

ModState Magazine

Aurora, Colorado 80017

For Immediate Release

Aurora, Colorado – 18 May 2019 –

In Honor of Lilly

It is with the heaviest of hearts that we address what is certainly the darkest and saddest chapter for ModState to date. Yesterday, managing editor J. DeViney and associate editor (and podcast host) Nate S. Wellein learned of the indictment of our former copy editor, Albin Eldeen, by The State of Texas on charges of child sexual assault. His apparent arrest in November 2018 and subsequent indictment in February 2019 (both occurring in San Antonio, Texas) was information that was made available to Mr. DeViney (The GNO /New Orleans metro) and Mr. Wellein (Denver metro) yesterday evening.

With that, we dually thank Mr. Eldeen for his efforts as copy editor to ensure exacting editorial standards were met and to provide “Layman’s Terms” assessments of the Bill of Rights. However, the decision within both houses (editorial and multimedia) of ModState Magazine was unanimous in removing all content authored by Mr. Eldeen that was ever posted to the editorial site, and furthermore to dismiss him from his advisory role permanently.

While we also feel it is important that justice be carried out before denouncing anyone in the court of public opinion, regardless of the charges leveled against them, we also feel very strongly that, even should a legal outcome favorable to Mr. Eldeen occur, any future efforts by his person should be expended in the best interests of his immediate and extended family units. Therefore, while Albin Eldeen served honorably as a NCO (non-commissioned officer) in the United States Army (including nearly two years of which was spent alongside fellow Army veteran Nate S. Wellein and Navy veteran J. DeViney at Walter Reed in Bethesda, Maryland), he is barred from any subsequent participation in our operations in any capacity, regardless of future legal outcomes.

By direction: DeViney-Wellein, Ltd., legal agent of ModState, ModState.com & ModState Magazine, and accountable officer Jonathan D. DeViney

#######

Read More

Political Beast: Two-Year (Cotton Anniversary) Retrospective

And somewhere, weeping in the still of the night, came bleating The Carpenters’ “We’ve Only Just Begun”

The following contains references to articles published by ModState over the past two years. If you don’t get it, then you didn’t read it. Tradition tells us this is our “cotton” anniversary, so if something sounds offensive, or racist, or derisive of a contributor, you’re a moron with cotton brains. Or you didn’t read the article(s) referenced. If you still don’t like what you hear, stick cotton in your ears.

And enjoy.

Quite less than a score* and a few months or so ago (30 April, 2016), our ModState fathers, DeViney and “staff” [creative name for more DeViney] brought forth on the World Wide Web a new concept, conceived in the rights of “these United States” (Dude, the Civil War is over. It’s “The United States.” Sheesh!) and dedicated to NeoSpeak (“Newspeak”), the hypocrisy of boycotts, and the belief that all versions of Trump’s Wall are created equal to the task of pissing off law enforcement in Arizona.

Now we are engaged in a great Civil War. A war over documents, a war over election interference. A war testing what the hell Devin Nunes (R-CA) was thinking getting into that limo to begin with. A war testing whether Lily Eldeen can single-handedly change the voting age, and whether Political Beast is named as a rip-off of the Daily Beast, or simply a mistype of “political beat” that no one ever thought to correct. Whatever. We are met on this, the “cotton” anniversary of ModState, on what is seen as a great battlefield of fake news vs. bold truth. We are come, fully-clothed in cotton polos, to dedicate a large portion of this site as the final repository of the ideas and inspirations of the contributors and columnists with whom ModState works. It is altogether irritating and frustrating to our editors to have to fix these articles before publication, but hey, shit happens.

“Nobody wails more sincerely than me, I can tell you that. Many, many people tell me this. Believe me.”

But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground, not with all the cotton seed in the world. Not this, or the ground in Flint, Michigan Teresa Leary wept for in her 2017 article. Or the rainbow-colored ground of American diversity described by Anny Hughes. The brave men like Al Eldeen, risking insanity slogging through an exhaustive examination of our Constitution’s amendments, or DeViney and Wellein producing studio-quality podcasts, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say in this anniversary piece, but they will never forget the restraint we all showed in not saying what the Hell we really thought in the midst of this fiasco some dare label an administration.

They tried telling DeViney back in 2009 he wasn’t present for the aftermath of Watergate. He didn’t believe the blonde, and he doesn’t believe us. C’est la vie.

It is rather for us, the moderately sane, cotton-loving “staff” of ModState to be here dedicated to the unfinished work of finding sources like the eminent Mitch Tyner and the great Geoff Shepard to open to the people the truth about the causes and catastrophes men like this have witnessed in the struggles they so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us. It is rather for us that in these articles we gain a real sense of devotion in DeViney’s play-by-play of Trump’s inevitable debate against Biden or Sanders in 2020, of interest in whom Gabe Coker will suggest as a laughable third option the night before the election; and of inquiry, as we wonder when Wellein is going to finally convince DeViney that our managing editor didn’t actually live through the Watergate break-in. And all that aside, that we here highly resolve that these articles should not have been written, edited, and published in vain. That this current events site, under brash, unapologetic and disrespectful leadership, shall have a new birth of offensive bravery. More Vietnam, more Nixon v. Kennedy, more stuff apparently fabricated somewhere in Babylon. That this magazine of the truth, by the truth, and for the truth, shall not perish from the Earth without cotton…the fabric of our lives.

 

 

 

* = Upon receipt, DeViney asked, “Score? Who’s scoring here? What and when do they score? Nobody tells me anything.”

Read More