Political Beast: Democratic Debate Night 1 Round 2 Dembate!

Dembate 1!

Here are the contestants again (in brief):

 

-Senator Cory Booker, New Jersey

-Julian Castro, former Secreatary of Housing an Urban Development

-Bill de Blasio, Mayor of NYC

-Former Congressman John DeLaney, Maryland

-Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii

-Governor Ray Inslee, Washington

-Senator Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota

-Former Congressman Beto O’Rourke, Texas

-Congressman Tim Ryan, Ohio

-Senator Elizabeth Warren, Massachusetts

 

The second round of moderators:

-Chuck Todd, host of “Meet the Press” and NBC News political director.

-Rachel Maddow, host of “The Rachel Maddow Show” on MSNBC.

 

To set you up properly, please note Round Two focused much more on emotional issues and controversy.

Here it is/was:

Question for Sen. Warren: We’re currently 50 miles from Parkland, FL. Is there a role for the Fed in gun control? Here there was a major microphone problem. Lots of interference from former moderator mics. Cut to commercial. Interesting “We’ll be back soon” screen with date and time and “TV COMMERCIAL BREAK IN PROGRESS.” Looks like what we used to see at the end of the night, back when TV actually went off air. Weird. Interestingly, you can’t find this on YouTube. NBC cut it in the repack online. Ha!!!— Ok, so when Warren gets back to answering, she says she’s done more than 100 town halls, took 1000s of questions about the fed’s role in gun control. Most difficult is what do to do to keep us safe. Kids and teens die every day from guns. It’s a national health emergency. What’s sensible? Universal background checks, a ban on “weapons of war.” Do research, end sense of violence engulfing the kids. Moderators insist she answer the question—She says “Do serious research.” A collector isn’t the same as kid with a gun. Let’s make real change. [Where to start here? Universal background checks are the current standard nationwide. What Warren isn’t saying is “end person-to-person sales.” This is the only way to make every purchase go through a background check. How would she accomplish this? No criticism here, just a NECESSARY follow-up question! “Weapons of war” is an interesting variation on “assault weapons.” Very creative. Also very vague… “Do research?” We’ll wait for details. “End sense of violence.” Does this mean banning violent video games? Making guns illegal close to schools? Fixing potholes? Again, we’ll wait for details]

For Sen. Booker: “You have a buy-back program. How does this work?” Booker says he’s been hearing supposed solutions for awhile. “I hear gun shots every night in my neighborhood. We’re tired of having to teach kids about how to deal with an active shooter in their school. We’ve let the corporate gun lobby frame this debate for too long.” [Mad props for choosing to live in the type of neighborhood he’s trying to fix. Political Beast will leave it at that. Really mad props.]

Sec. Castro’s question: Active shooter drills. Parents afraid to send kids to school. No law changes. Will it get worse, or what will you do? Castro points out he’s a dad of a tenyear-old girl, and the worst thing is thinking your kid will worry about what will happen at school. After 2020, Castro claims he’ll have a Dem prez, House, and Sen, and activists against guns who’ve risen up will see legislative action. He’ll do it, even if it means ending the filibuster rule in the Senate.

—Sen Ryan interjects: Need to do counseling to stop bullied kids from becoming shooters.

To O’Rourke: “You come from a conservative state. What do you say to the guy who likes everything but your gun positions?” The former Congressman says he shares the stories of survivors of school shootings, talks about universal background checks, end of assault weapons and weapons of war. Also pushes “red flag laws,” where if someone poses a threat to themselves or someone else, they’re prevented from buying. Almost everyone agrees when it’s explained clearly, especially when the charge is lead by young people. [Every movement begun by every group of young survivors of school shootings has led to meaningful legislation…but only in states where guns are almost totally banned already. Remains to be seen how much power these young people (who can’t vote yet) really have.]

Sen. Klobuchar: Gun confiscation. Is this a conversation people are ready to have? The Senator says that when it comes to gun control, the test she puts policy to is, “Does this hurt my Uncle Dick in his deer stand?” She doesn’t see these laws doing this. She says we’ve all failed the parents and students that are victims of these gun crimes. If we get bested by these teenagers shaming us into doing something, good. [Klobuchar walks a fine line here. She sets up a reasonable standard, perhaps, with the “Uncle Dick” test, but then immediately embraces gun buy-backs and gun confiscation whole-cloth. This is a dance that’s gonna get tough when the music speeds up moving forward.]

 

Back to Booker: Do you think you could get the Senate to confirm your Sup Court nominees if they support gun control? “Let me first say, if you need a license to drive a car you should have a license to own a firearm.” He points out that in Connecticut, where licenses are required, there has been a 40% drop in gun crime, and a 15% drop in the suicide rate. Whoever is the Dem candidate needs to be able to win in South Carolina, in Iowa, with a progressive agenda, but not necessarily an aggressive agenda. [Political Beast likes facts, but, unfortunately—no, like unfortunately—the numbers on gun crime and suicides is linked strongly to the opioid problem in New England. We need more statistics to disentangle the two. Creative thinking, though: “progressive, not aggressive.”]

To Mayor De Blasio: “You are used to saying what you want to happen and seeing it happen. What makes you believe Mitch McConnell will let you appoint the justices you want?” De Blasio says he does have a different perspective, and we need to have a better relationship with police. He’s raising a black son in America, and there are too many tragedies between our youth and the police. We need to have a better conversation about gun crime but also about policing. Stop being the party of no and the party of yes, and we can get these justices approved. [Like many of De Blasio’s answers and interjections, there’s a lot of pre-prepared material here, even if it’s not pre-judged for appropriate placement. For instance, dropping his adopted black son into a conversation about Mitch McConnell and Supreme Court nominees may not create an instant connection in the minds of voters.]

A gem for Senator Warren: “Do you have a plan to deal with Mitch McConnell?” [Can we take our turn at interjecting here, please? Just this once? Since when does the Majority Leader of the United States Senate himself get transformed into a problem to be solved in a question during a Presidential debate?!? Can you imagine someone asking a Republican candidate for Senate in 2018, “Do you have a plan to deal with Barack Obama?” We call B.S.] Back to Warren’s answer: She says the will of the people is supposed to matter in this country. Our middle class has been ignored recently. Those with armies of lobbyists and lawyers get stuff done. Short of a Democratic majority in the House and Senate, Dems will have to lead from the White House. “We have to push from the outside, give leadership from the inside, and make Congress reflect the will of the people.” [Ok, this is clear enough: First of all, the question makes clear that Mitch McConnell has gone from being the respectable Majority Leader of the Senate to being merely a disreputable problem to be solved by the Dems, and, secondly, the answer is Democrat rule of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches. Easy enough!]

Same line of questioning for DeLaney: You seem to think you can get things done in a bipartisan way. What makes you think McConnell will do this? DeLaney is willing to pass laws with one party if he has to, but we need real solutions, not impossible promises, and that’s the key to getting it done across the aisle. Working together has a long tradition in this country. People in Western Maryland tell him all the time, Dems and Republicans each get nothing done. [Hard to argue with this line of reasoning. It’s factually true less legislation has been passed since 2008 than in any 10-year period since the Civil War.]

Back to Booker (notice Maddow and Todd pitching repeatedly to their favorite here): How do you get bills on the floor with McConnell? “When I got to the Senate as a African American man, I knew from the beginning that criminal justice was a real problem. People told me we could not get comprehensive reform done.” He says “First Steps” is not perfect, but it’s a start. [Although his answer is somewhat convoluted, it is true that, along with Senator Klobuchar and President Trump (and Kanye West), Booker got some real work done with First Step.]

Governor Inslee finally gets a question: You have staked your candidacy on climate change. You’ve said it’s priorities 1-3 of your campaign. Does your plan save Miami from sea rise? “Yes, first by taking away Mitch McConnell’s gavel (nice touch).” We’re in a climate crisis, and this is the last chance, in this next administration, to do something about it. Inslee‘s WA plan has been called the gold standard in putting people back to work, with green energy jobs. He’s the only one that’s saying this has got to be the mobilizing principle of our nation. [Nothing about Inslee’s plan has been put through a cost analysis, and yes, here Political Beast will fail to fulfill your hopes for one. Let’s see who’s first to tackle that, then we’ll see how serious Inslee is as a threat.]

Back to Texan O’Rourke: You want big changes in a short time. What’s your message to those who supports the overall goal, but don’t like government telling them what to do? O’Rourke’s answer? Gotta bring everyone in to the conversation. He describes a town he was in recently (Pacific Junction) that hadn’t flooded before, now surrounded by three other towns that had flooded, and was “already underwater from Trump’s tariffs.”[Oooooh, nice alliteration.] We have to capture more carbon out of the air, pay farmers to clean the environment. [Political Beast is not even gonna touch this; these ideas are so amorphous.]

Castro’s turn: Who pays for the mitigation on climate change, whether sea walls or not? Is this a federal government issue, or should the government be involved at all in places where people should just move? Castro says: That’s not a meaningful part of the issue. He’s been working in Puerto Rico with HUD, trying to deal with natural disasters in a sustainable way, not blaming those who live on the coasts. [Man, we mean, what do you say when you’re asked, “Will you expect 50 million people nationwide to just abandon their cities and leave the coast?” If the warnings are real, though, that’s the reality. Can’t blame Castro for dodging, though.]

We finally get around to Congressman Ryan: There are lots of plans include taxing carbon. WA state tried it, it failed at the polls. How do we pay for climate change improvement? —Ryan pivots here, and it isn’t popular. Pay attention— “We could talk about climate, guns, or any issue, but Dems have a perception problem. Not connecting to mainstream people. We’ve got to change the center of gravity from elitist and coastalist to mainstream, working class —not getting any applause here—or we won’t win.” [Much respect to a candidate who uses his rare opportunity to speak to try and poke his party toward success, however much they dislike it.]

Tulsi Gabbard and a change of direction: Why should voters who care about LGBT issues trust you, when you’ve changed your views in the past? The Congresswoman says no one should tell anyone who they should love or marry. She serves on the equality caucus. She grew up in a conservative home, held views she no longer holds. She’s served with LGBT soldiers, and she would give her life for them and vice versa. We need to address discrimination in housing and civil rights. [Nothing weird or worrisome here. People’s positions change. Obama’s did, and he’s the most popular non-assassinated ex-prez since Teddy Roosevelt.]

—Booker interjects: We don’t talk enough about trans rates of murder or LGBT kids not going to school because they’re scared.

For Klobuchar, a Poly Sci query: Issue of demographics and civil rights. Dems have always counted on black and LGBT support, now they’re counting on Hispanics. What have you done for civil rights? First, we have to make sure the STEM jobs are going to minorities. Senator Klobuchar helped pass the bill Trump signed helping fix this. A black woman in New Orleans has her baby die when she goes to a hospital with swollen hands, and black women make $0.51 for every dollar a white man makes. [The numbers are correct on pay discrepancy, not clear on what the woman in New Orleans has to do with civil rights. Not being calloused toward loss of life, just making note of a really odd pivot.]

Castro: You’re Hispanic. Is that enough to make you relevant? [He gives examples of many minorities abused. Says it’s not just about Hispanics. Who has the balls to ask this question on national television, phrased just this way?!]

 

—Question from audience: “Do we have an obligation to help those around the world whose safety do not affect Americans directly?”

O’Rourke: “Yes, but only in consultation with our allies. Unfortunately, under this administration, Trump has alienated our allies and diminished our position in the world. As president, I’ll make sure we strengthen our allegiances.”

DeBlasio interjects: “What about the War Powers Act? We’ve learned painful lessons about ourselves as Americans. We’ve gone to war without Congressional authorization. My dad served in the Pacific with physical and emotional scars, ultimately took his own life. Even in a humanitarian crisis, we shouldn’t go to war without Congressional approval. We learned this in Vietnam, but we’ve forgotten.”

To Tim Ryan: Why isn’t the war in Afghanistan over? How would you get us out? Answer: He’s been in Congress on the Armed Services Committee for 12 years. Nobody likes it, but you have to stay engaged in these places. Trump doesn’t even have people in place to deal with situations around the world. These flare-ups like a drone getting shot down cost us and take away money we could us in communities around the country. [Again, telling the audience what they don’t want to hear. Stupid? Smart? Braindead? Brave?]

—Gabbard interjects: “So, that’s what you say to soldiers’ families? You just have to stay engaged? We are no better in Afghanistan now than we were when we began.” [We’ll treat this as hyperbole, not as a real claim.]

Ryan: “I don’t want to be engaged here either, but the reality is if we don’t stay, the Taliban will grow.” Gabbard says we won’t squash this Taliban who was there before us and will be there after us. Taliban didn’t attack us on 9/11. Ryan insists the Taliban was protecting those who did attack us. If you think we should withdraw from the world, you’re agreeing with Trump. [Valid positions, both.]

 

—Open question: Greatest geopolitical threat to the U.S.—

DeLaney: China, greatest threat nuclear weapons

Inslee: Donald Trump

Gabbard: Fact that we’re at a greater threat of nuclear war than ever in our history

Klobuchar: China and Iran

O’Rourke Climate change

Warren: Climate change

Booker: Nuclear war and climate change

Castro: China and climate change

Ryan: China

De Blasio: Russia

O’Rourke: As president, how would you address Trump’s potential crimes? O’Rourke goes way back and points out that Washington resigning his commission is a great precedent. Not pursuing Trump will set a precedent that some people are above the law. We start impeachment now. If we don’t now, O’Rourke says he will pursue these facts with the DOJ. [Amazing that NBC would allow their moderators to ask questions about impeachment, potentially after Mueller AND CONGRESS will have cleared President Trump.]

DeLaney: No U.S. president has ever been pursued after office. Can it happen? “No one is above the law. I support Speaker Pelosi, and she knows more than any of us. This president is lawless and shouldn’t be above the law. This isn’t the number one issue the voters ask us about. Drug prices, jobs, infrastructure. Only 50 counties got 90% of the startup money last year. There are 3000 counties. No one asks about the Mueller Report.” [Well put.]

—Klobuchar interjects: “If we don’t pursue him, we’re letting Russia and the Republicans run our elections.”

 

—————CLOSING ARGUMENTS—————

DeLaney: Together we are on a mission to find the America that’s lost through inaction. We created the America n dream for lots like me, son of an immigrant. We did this with real solutions, not impossible promises. I’m running to solve the problems. If infrastructure, comprehensive health care and immigration and jobs or local towns.

De Blasio: It matters in this fight for the heart and soul of our country. It matters that you nominate someone who’s seen the face of poverty and given people a $15 minimum wage. Saw the destruction wrought by bad health care and gave universal health care and Pre-K for free. I’ve done this in NY and want to do it for America. Putting working people first matters.

Inslee: We have three grandchildren, I made a decision that on my last day on earth, I want to be able to look them in the eye and tell them I did everything I did to protect them from the ravages of climate change. I’m the only one to make it the top priority. If you join me, we Chan have a unified national message, save our children and the life on this planet. This is our moment.

Ryan: There’s nothing worse than not being heard or seen. I know, because I represent a forgotten community. They try to divide us between black or gay or male. I come from the middle o industrial America, but there are forgotten people all across America, homeless in LA or a nurse in New Hampshire. When I walk in the Oval Office every morning, you will not be forgotten

Gabbard: Our nation was founded on service above self. Putting in place a government that serves the people, not puts stuff on the backs of people, to the service of the rich and powerful. Our White House will be a beacon of light, where people eat free health care, good jobs, Anne’s green economy and clean air.

Castro: Spanish [to thundering applause]: I know the promise of America. I will work hard every day for your education, health, and jobs. We’ll say adios to Donald Trump

Klobuchar: Three things. I listen and I get things done. Second, I can win and beat Donald Trump. I’ve won in the reddest districts, and third, I am not the establishment candidate. Don’t come from money, don’t have a machine.

Booker: Fifty years ago this month we moved into a neighborhood because whites fought for us to be allowed to buy a house. We do best when we work together. I’ll call us to a common purpose. This is a referendum on who we are. What we need and deserve is to be shown the best of us.

O’Rourke: I’m on the stage for those that are sleeping under aluminum tents tonight. Climate activists, students, we will bring all of them in and that’s how we beat Donald Trump. This is our moment.

Warren: Great honor to be here. Born and raised in Oklahoma. By the time I graduated high school, we had no money, so I couldn’t be a teacher, but I got a $50 a semester scholarship to a Community College. That little bit of government helped me. That’s what it’s for, and that’s what I want to do with our government, to bring us together and serve everyone.

 

Gonzo State: [Untitled]

“Victory is ‘The Absence of Defeat'”

“Bentley! Bentley. I suggest…I suggest that you do something different with your life right now.” This instruction was delivered by my boss (at the time) to his unruly Huskie, but it might as well have been given to my entire generation.

As always, the day had given way to night and my mind had wrestled with itself long enough. I needed sanctuary, strong drink and a blank expression with which to watch the news on screens behind the heads of the locals. With the mind of a fried pie I careened my car down a thoroughfare of an unincorporated town in West Virginia, roughly sixty miles from Washington D.C.

“Babylon,” I came to call D.C. as a Sailor stationed in Bethesda, which was appropriate enough that no one cares to question the nickname. It was by a sense of awe, despair, disgust and reverence that I came by it the hard way some years ago.

The Christmas lights around Arlington had shone brightly on my most sentimental evening, awash with history and the sort of romance that saw my Army counterpart’s cheek against mine, her words in my ear accompanied by my kiss on her neck.

Then, the other shoe dropped and zang! I’m departing the parking garage of Target near P.F. Chang’s, a sudden desperate attempt to keep a fellow servicemember alive and out of trouble, and barely having arrived in Rockville, Maryland, found myself in the company of a remarkable amount of police officers. While all was eventually sorted out (one way or another), I did discover that being handcuffed, face down on the pavement amidst a soft rain gave me an amazing opportunity to learn and reevaluate the nonsense I’d allowed a foothold in my life. “Teachable moments,” I’ve come to call such events with a wince oft confused for a smile, and rightfully so.

“It’s an acquired taste.”

Let no good deed go unpunished.

“It was all downhill from there,” I uttered to my glass and coaster on the bar, awaiting another potent haul of ethanol. “Or is it, ‘down on the bed’ from there? Not nearly as catchy.” The general uproar that passed for ambience as karaoke loomed large made my private social commentaries a non-factor.

“Hell,” I continued, mulling over the equal parts glory and horror of yesteryear, “if I was a woman they’d’ve labeled me a slut.” This was most certainly true, as I had responded to the eventual collapse of the genuine, heartmelting romance that blossomed in Arlington by carousing. I went on to live up to the archetype of heathen in the Navy, only I hadn’t needed a new port. D.C. had an endless supply of trysts for me to temporarily bind the wound of heartbreak with. I had largely imploded things with she myself, but damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead, aye?

“Aye, got it!” I said, louder than intended as my libation arrived. Few noticed, none cared. But I digress.

Every single horror of the corruption of public life crept its way into Walter Reed the two years I’d been there as the primary Army and Navy hospitals merged there in Maryland. It was a handful of miles from the epicenter of our Federal Republic, our Representative Democracy. Whatever label you prefer, the genuine, tender romance and the unnecessary legal crucible were equal parts of the same story.

So it was yesterday and is today and will be tomorrow. Wars and rumors of wars will abound along with the usual ugliness, while the bountiful opportunities, resplendence, and monuments sacred to America and Her Republic will ring hollow for any looking for that chapter. However, for those with a soul not set for self-destruct, there was the beauty and elegance and love that I discovered in Babylon. For my part, I vacillated between the cauldron of brutality and the essence of hallowed humanity.

Lucifer and a third of his fellow angels rebelled (at least in part) over the perception that God valued something fashioned from dirt over them; we hamstrung ourselves with our humanity during that time (2011-2013) in Bethesda, both our frailties and our strengths.

Did we make the case against humanity with our failures? I’m not so sure. The defeatism and Apocalypticism of the admittedly conflicted era that was the “new” Walter Reed circa 2011-2013 stands apart from now in several ways. Without the deflating drudgery of rattling them all off, at the very least one could look their friends and enemies in the eye. Betrayal and intrigue might be lurking around the next corner (per the modus operandi of Babylon and the government circuit as a whole) but those seeming eons ago politics was still the art of compromise. Then-POTUS Obama (D-IL) and then-House Speaker Boehner (R-OH) can hardly be soberly accused of engaging in the politics of blood sport we’ve now.

Now? Depending on their background, looking one’s enemies and/or friends in the eye might get you flagged on any number of social media platforms and could very well get you labeled with some sort of “-ism”, as one type of “-ist” or another. A whole decade ago Section 230 was applied within the spirit of its creation, lending the happenings online a sort of Wild West vibe when juxtaposed to the great cosmic gag-reel taking place now.

“What is Section 230?” one might ask. This, too, is a well-placed and unscripted question, but it makes little difference when Louis Farrakhan can spit his vile verbal excrement at hapless passerby on social media, but not Donald Trump. No, indeed. Hardly an avid defender of the former POTUS, I nonetheless present our Federal support and protections for our Silicon Valley overlords as Exhibit A for the how/why (either/and/or) the Federal Communications Commission has adequate pretext to cry foul. This is tantamount to “collateral censorship”, or censorship by proxy. That’s the biggest item George Orwell didn’t foresee in my favorite novel, “1984”: private enterprise conducting the censorship, and not the state itself.

Since I’ve likely lost anyone who hates The Donald for my defending his First Amendment rights, I might as well toss a grenade in this burgeoning dumpster fire. Wouldn’t Joe Manchin lead off that way?

“The wind only blows sometimes.” “He’s exactly right!”

While hardly the binary option both the Communists of the Far Left and the Fascists of the Far Right want all the Sheeple to give an “Amen!” and believe, the conflict between being a John Locke liberal in favor of largely laissez-faire capitalism (not the crony kind) with a strong, (but) limited Federal government and in wanting a respectable return on our investment in Section 230 protections granted Silicon Valley (and company), it is amusing on a perverse level.

“Afterall,” I told myself, “everyone hates a centrist, so you might as well enjoy it, Jack. The good news is, only White elitists are storming off after closing your column a few paragraphs back. They can kick rocks. There’s surely a Mother Jones article or athletic mutant defecating on the very flag that enables their miserable existence out there, somewhere, that they can flee to. Still miserable, but they showed me! No First Amendment for the people who make us think and shit.”

It was only at the end of this paragraph that I realized I wasn’t just thinking this as I tapped it into a note on my phone for later insertion into this very diatribe. I was muttering much of it out loud.

“Ignore the madness of a world that has made this swashbuckler appear normal. Ignore the celebutante-rejects aghast at those not absorbed in Chinese spyware ‘social’ apps available on any mainstream App Store.”

And why not? Afterall, the Communists now want the populace to swallow the latest swill their Thought Police have puked out, and nod slowly, basking in the wisdom of the notion that Black children being taught mathematics is racist. Conversely, the Fascists want the citizenry at-large to embrace their latest, unintelligible Reductio Ad Absurdum that beating cops to a pulp while shouting racist terms at the non-White officers is okay as long as they’re patriots. Thin Blue Line and all. “Thin Blue Line”, you ingrates? Put the straw down.

“In God We Trust.” Mhmm.

“Dear God Almighty,” I mumbled into my Long Island Iced Tea, nearly gone due to the urgent need to anesthetize myself. No reply, and not because He wants us to forget He exists, but because it’s the pizza we ordered, and it has arrived with all the trappings. Whose fault is that?

The lunacy in the former example is in those on the Far Left who by proxy think the Black intellect is so dormant, psyche so timid, that there need be no Black doctors, economists, engineers, et cetera, in the future. Mathematics is a rather integral part of the process of those career paths. Who’s holding who back with racist ideology again, exactly?

The madness in the latter example is at least as vivid and particularly poignant from people on the Far Right who think cops can do no wrong. You say The Filth went too far in Example X? “I say they didn’t go too far enough!” some neo-Successionist will bleat with the fervor of a patriot, by God. Just a patriot to another country, and not this one. But why quibble about it? Sure, seems reasonable enough to pass muster on “Squidbillies.”

Imitation being the highest form of flattery, the method to the unorthodoxy of this publication has never been less necessary. Both extremes in the sadly binary world of Castro and Mussolini neophytes demand the long-term vision, the sort of engaging in politics (again, “The Art of Compromise”) as a year-round endeavor that there is no app or “hack” for. The marathon, not the sprint, is what is at hand. I’d rather flatter the Edward Brooke III, the Alexander Hamilton, the Barbra Streisand, the Hunter S. Thompson and even the Master Shake with imitation than embrace the intellectual suicide of either Irredeemable America or Exceptional American Unilateralism.

Whichever clown car takes the stage from either extremist wing of discourse, they both will assure us that we’d feel so much better if only we’d embrace their brand of groupthink. Tsk, tsk, I know, but such is the rot of the putrescence we’ve inexplicably opted to wallow in.

“Soylent Green is people.”

What both teams of malcontents mean is we’ll feel much better carrying all of our favorite shows with us on all of our devices as they continue embezzling and funneling money to the duopoly in Babylon. The royalty on Capitol Hill will then reward our wholehearted faith with continued malignant governance and further insolvency on every level (social, fiscal, geopolitical, et al).

“Who knows?” I mumbled with a shrug. “With any luck, the dead will walk again and we’ll have an existential reason to disallow the Neanderthals in Congress from fucking the same coconut over and over while saying they’re carrying out the people’s business. All, naturally, with a straight face. And pursed lips. Can’t forget the ‘duck face.’ Gotta meet my fellow Millennials halfway.”

“You say something, Hun?”

The bartender had taken notice of my glass being devoid of strong drink, and grew concerned. Animals entering sexual congress with fruit, however, passed muster.

‘Of course it did,’ I thought, but could only reply with a low rasp as I exited my barstool.

“Yes, Ma’am. Check please.”

Read More

Six Degrees of Knowin’ Nothin’: [Untitled]

And on the 8th day, God made bears. Lots and lots of bears.

Does this era need introduction? Or, rather, may a suitable introduction be written? I report, you deride.

1: In any rational era, the sudden appearance of lurid photographs of well-known public figures tends to happen without the consent of those captured in the images. Jennifer Lawrence, Kate Upton, Anthony Weiner, et al. Notable exceptions to this are of the celebutante variety who sport last names such as Hilton and Kardashian, but then, their deliberate release of self-incriminating material isn’t indicative of a rational era.

That there’s a Stairway to Heaven but a Highway to Hell is indicative of expected traffic volume.

The great Jerry Falwell, Jr., well his undeniable greatness as an Evangelical Christian minister and university president is so ineffable, so vast, that he was no longer able to be confined by any notion of modern decency. If that’s still a thing, that is. Either way, the photograph posted containing the erstwhile head of Liberty University (and descendent of the late and decent Jerry Falwell) is disturbing on several counts. Let’s take a look:

Now, I’m not sure if it’s the ghastly attempt at humor (yeah, “black water”, haw haw haw!), the self-caricature of the gut and the unzipped pants combined with the awful rug on his counterpart (who is not his wife, for those keeping score at home), the fact that students of said Evangelical university get expelled for drinking and/or extra-marital sexual encounters, or that this wasn’t a leak at all that makes this such a disgrace. He could’ve just said it was a faux Black Dog in his glass and been done with it.

The man (so-called) “leaked” it via his own social media aperture, and then delivered a truly abysmal mockery of an apology on-air, and I quote: “I’ve promised my kids I’m going to try to be…I’m gonna try to be a good boy from here on out.” Rock and Roll, Jerry!

Oh and Mrs. Falwell, when your marriage does end, remember: you [expletive deleted] your rebound, and that’s it. You don’t permanently abscond from reality and keep [expletive deleted] them long-term and/or marry them. Especially, I might add, if you plucked them from the extras of “The Walking Dead.”

Silly me. But seriously, though: booze and Evangelicals and social media shouldn’t mix.

2: At times, the headlines write themselves. In their own attempt to swing loose with reality, as it were, Iran has a fabricated aircraft carrier resembling one of those wielded by the United States Navy. “Why”, you ask? An entirely unscripted and well-placed question. For their own propaganda purposes that is, until the entire experiment blew up in their faces. Living out their own version of “delirium tremens”, Iran was so successful in this charade that their accidental destruction of a prop US Navy aircraft carrier poses a threat to a major thoroughfare in the oil trade. Posing an existential threat to traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, and things apparently unbeknownst to Iran such as tides can shift the wreckage, endangering oil tankers.

Give the Ayatollah our best. Speaking of “the best”, if you’re going to challenge the world’s preeminent naval power, you’d better come correct. The Battle of Evermore this is not.

3: Biden must face Trump in debate(s). Yes, it’s answering a “double dog dare” from the POTUS and no, you don’t want to give in to the whims of a bully. But if you don’t follow through then it looks like you’re hiding in a basement and afraid to face Donald J. Trump on the stage. What’s the worst that could happen? They then “triple dog dare” one another to a lindy hop dance-off to the “Misty Mountain Hop” or hand out four sticks (one to both members of each ticket) to swing with? Why would you be afraid of that if you’re in the Biden camp unless, per the Trump camp’s assertions, the former Vice President will be unable to remember whether he’s going to California, or another, “y’know, the thing” that the Founding Fathers said? The great equalizer is the human ego. They’ll debate.

This is an event waiting to go wrong. Don’t hang out with bears. [image credit to Daily Caller & Barstool Sports]
4: Meanwhile, the National Park Service has posted a warning urging American adventurers not to confront bears but, if they do, to not take advantage of their slower companions. And no, this is not made up. Nor is the response of a pack of humans, recently, to a bear arriving in their midst. They didn’t flee or otherwise attempt to discourage the bear; instead they took pictures of their merry band whilst feeding the bear. Good call, ‘Murica.

5: Bill Barr’s appearance was a disgrace for everyone except the Attorney General. For committee chairman Nadler, to open the hearing with that statement was an outrage; and Jordan, thanks for the monologue on things that happened before Barr was back on the job and for God’s sake put your damn coat on!

6: Stat of the Week: the POTUS’ campaign is knocking on 1 million doors a week; the former VPOTUS’ camp is knocking on 0. As in ZERO. Z-E-R-O. This sort of nonsense only seems like nonsenseuntil the time when the levee breaks. Underestimate the mad media genius of The Donald at your peril.

Y’know what? Let’s just cancel everything. If everything’s priority one, then nothing is priority one.
Read More

Contrast: Black Lives Matter v. All Lives Matter (et al)

Black Lives Matter: Let’s cut through the fat together, shall we? Yes or yes? Good. With that, we have a problem in America. Several, actually. We live in a police state, for one thing, and for another, paramount now, is said police state taking a particular interest in African Americans.

Let’s also consider the unbelievable, highly-classified powers of FISA courts to spy unopposed on our own people without their knowledge indefinitely, the ability of the Federal government to suspend the Constitutional rights of American citizens suspected of terrorism via the Patriot Act and the inexplicable repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act (which forbade the Federal Government from using propaganda on American soil). Are you drinking what I’m pouring?

With no malice in my heart toward the many fine police officers across the land (a few I’ve known personally), I say again: we live in a police state.

Over the past decade alone, we have seen increasing examples of the use of excessive force on a disproportionate number of black Americans. Data clearly shows that Whites compose 76.5% of America’s citizenry while Blacks make up 13.4% of it, the former were shot to death by police 370 times versus 235 for the latter.

For those who want to bring out FBI data displaying prevalence of crime amongst inner city black neighborhoods, recall the negligible difference in drug use between whites and blacks and the parity in gun culture between the two.

America glorifies violence, and that crosses ethnic lines. Don’t believe me? Look at what I call “Dollar Voting”, in essence, what we value and spend our money on. What does our art and culture reflect? If we’re being real, it ain’t peace. Does hip hop culture lend itself to violence? Listen to the top ten hits of the genre and get back to me; but before you get back to me, let me know what Johnny Cash, Waylon Jennings, Jerry Reed and “The Dukes of Hazzard” were all about while you’re at it.

As for the movement itself, “Black Lives Matter” is driving home a simple point: yes, every house in the neighborhood matters but only one of them is on fire.

We hardly need a hashtag for Blue (Police) Lives Matter; they roam about largely unopposed, vested with a badge and lethal weaponry, and we provide a safety net (union, pension, et cetera) and, in general, blanket support to include the high probability that bad actors aren’t held accountable in court.

All Lives Matter? Do they? Maybe I’d be more decisive in answering these questions if every new episode of “Death By Cop” didn’t always star a black man.

– Jack DeViney

*************

 

New Orleans Police Department preps for ongoing confrontation and protest throughout downtown.

All Lives Matter(?): Two things can be true at once. In fact, very few things in our world are mutually exclusive of themselves. One can, for example, be in favor of the events in the George Floyd case never happening again and find the phrase “Black Lives Matters” offensive. They are not mutually exclusive. Both can be true. This depends on your definitions of words. Words matter. Words have meaning. Facts matter. Facts have meaning.

If by any definition, one is not a racist, but they will not stand shoulder to shoulder with Black Lives Matter signs, or they won’t kneel down in front of a mob of protestors, they become….what? Insensitive? Divisive?

To be true to this point, I believe “All Lives Matter” or “Blue Lives Matter” are equally asinine. We don’t protest on things we agree upon. We don’t stand outside and shout “the sky is blue”!

Are things worse now than the mid-1960’s? Or do we see public discord in 3D now? We report, you deride.

The assertion that a black man can not step from his home without fear of imminent death from a racist ‘Mericuh is as equally preposterous as the media’s “1619” narrative that America is as systemically racist as at any time in our history. Really? Where’s the poll of young, black men asking them if they’d rather live in 1865, 1965 or 2020? I must’ve missed that astute revelation.

Instead of regurgitated statistics that the left/media refuse to acknowledge anyway, how about we come at this from a novel approach. [So] what is your suggestion? I mean, with all of the statistics stating the exact opposite of your point, what are we doing wrong? Are our hiring standards too low? Is training being swept aside to fast-track officers onto beats? Do we provide immunity to officers that is unnecessary and counter-productive? Let’s get to the “nut cutting” as they say.

If we want to turn this into another narrative where the right just refuses to admit there is a substantial issue and is instead hiding behind years of conservative practices…show me! Where are the statistics that support any of this nonsense? That show America is systemically racist and prejudiced against black Americans? Where are the politicians that you are particularly citing as responsible for these aggressions? Or is it just “orange man bad”, with his “basket of deplorables”?

“You’re killing your father, Larry!”

Once again, the left/media have overplayed their hands. We were told millions of Americans would die if we didn’t shut the world down indefinitely. Now if you have a small business and want to re-open smartly so that you don’t lose everything, you’re killing grandma! We were told that if we would just allow LGBT marriages, all examples of bigotry would be history. Now if you’re a Millennial male that won’t go out with a trans-woman (a man by all scientific facts and definitions), you’re a homophobe! And now, if you won’t march to the beat of this drum, well, you’re just a racist. Or worse, an “Uncle Tom.”

It’s tiring. It’s divisive. It’s unnecessary. This issue is one we must agree on, or we don’t have a country. You cannot have law and order if one group is being systematically hunted down and killed by those sworn to protect us.

Facts matter. Statistics matter. Two things can be true at once.

– Michael R. DeViney, Jr.

Read More